From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Petroleum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 18, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1012-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Feb. 18, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1012-JWD-SDJ

02-18-2021

LATOYA LYNETTE WILLIAMS v. RACETRAC PETROLEUM


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc.43) dated February 3, 2021, to which no objection was filed,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 32) is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on February 18, 2021.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Williams v. Petroleum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 18, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1012-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Feb. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Petroleum

Case Details

Full title:LATOYA LYNETTE WILLIAMS v. RACETRAC PETROLEUM

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 18, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1012-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Feb. 18, 2021)

Citing Cases

Babin v. Lofton Corp.

, during his deposition, “denied that the other employees talked about any of his mental impairments”).…