From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Peterson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2022
1:22-cv-0019 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-0019 JLT EPG (PC)

06-03-2022

LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. A. PETERSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

Lance Williams is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se with this action. On April 21, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within 30 days. (Doc. 14 at 2.) Plaintiff was warned that “failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.” (Id. at 5, emphasis in original.) The 30-day period has expired, and Plaintiff failed to pay the $402 filing fee. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Peterson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2022
1:22-cv-0019 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. A. PETERSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-0019 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)