Williams v. PCR, Inc.

Full title: BRUCE M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. PCR, INC. and CLAIRIANT CORP., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

CASE NO.: 1:13cv33-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:13cv33-SPM/GRJ

03-18-2013

BRUCE M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. PCR, INC. and CLAIRIANT CORP., Defendants.

M. CASEY RODGERS

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 14, 2013. (Doc. 3). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objection timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any pending motions are terminated.

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

________________________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE