Opinion
Motion Nos. 2021-08971 2021-08972 2021-08973 2022-03017 2022-07836 Docket Nos. V-4277-2013/2021R V-9294-2018/2021H V-04277-2013/2021S V-09294-2018/2021I V-04277-2013/2021N V-09294-2018/2021E
01-09-2023
In the Matter of John A. Williams III, appellant, v. Brittany Panzarino, respondent. In the Matter of John A. Williams III, appellant, v. Brittany Panzarino, respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
M286744
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. ROBERT J. MILLER PAUL WOOTEN LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeals from three orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, all dated October 29, 2021. Separate appeal from an order of the same court dated April 6, 2022. Motion by the appellant for leave to appeal to this Court from a decision of the same court dated March 30, 2022, to stay enforcement of the decision dated March 30, 2022, and the order dated April 6, 2022, pending hearing and determination of the appeals, and to extend the time to perfect the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to appeal to this Court from the decision dated March 30, 2022, and to stay enforcement of the decision dated March 30, 2022, and the order dated April 6, 2022, pending hearing and determination of the appeals, are denied; and it is further, ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to perfect the appeals is granted to the extent that the appellant's time to perfect the appeals from the orders by causing the original papers constituting the record on appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[a][5]), and by serving and filing the appellant's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, by serving the appellant's brief, and uploading a digital copy of the appellant's brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website, is extended until February 8, 2023, and that branch of the motion is otherwise denied as academic.
CONNOLLY, J.P., MILLER, WOOTEN and WAN, JJ., concur.