From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Paige

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
(M.D. Ga. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

03-22-2013

BILLY JEROME WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES PAIGE and TERRY BROWN, Defendants.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 23). The motion is denied. This case has been referred to the Magistrate Judge and it is his responsibility to rule on all non-dispositive pretrial matters, including motions to appoint counsel. See M.D. Ga. L.R. 72.2. It is procedurally improper for a party to ask the district court for reconsideration of a ruling from the Magistrate Judge on a non-dispositive pretrial matter. Plaintiff may ask the Magistrate Judge for reconsideration of his order, but it is not the undersigned's place to reconsider the ruling.

_________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Paige

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
(M.D. Ga. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Paige

Case Details

Full title:BILLY JEROME WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES PAIGE and TERRY BROWN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

(M.D. Ga. Mar. 22, 2013)