Opinion
6:22-cv-1773-RBD-DCI
02-23-2024
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON, JR. United States District Judge
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Renewed Unopposed Motion for Court Approval of a Settlement Involving a Minor. (Doc. 44 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends that the Court grant the motion. (Doc. 45 (“R&R”).) The Motion is unopposed (see Doc. 44, p. 7), so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The R&R (Doc. 45) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. The Motion (Doc. 44) is GRANTED.
3. The parties' proposed Agreement (Doc. 41-1) is APPROVED.
4. Upon the Allen Law Firm, P.A.'s distribution of the payment to Plaintiffs as described in the Agreement (see id. ¶ 3), Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to place $25,000.00 in an annuity for S.W. until the age of majority and to utilize the remaining $14,000.00 for the care and benefit of S.W.
5. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED