From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Oppman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 25, 2023
2:20-CV-00663-CRE (W.D. Pa. May. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-CV-00663-CRE

05-25-2023

RASHAD WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL OPPMAN, MARK CAPOZZA, WARDEN AT SCI-FAYETTE; AND BENJAMIN LIEDHECKER, LT. OF CENTRAL OFFICE AND DIRECTOR OF SPC; Defendants,


ORDER OF COURT

Cynthia Reed Eddy, United States Magistrate Judge

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2023, upon consideration of the pending cross-motions for summary judgment, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 100) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff is hereby notified that he has thirty (30) days to file a Notice of Appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Williams v. Oppman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 25, 2023
2:20-CV-00663-CRE (W.D. Pa. May. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. Oppman

Case Details

Full title:RASHAD WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL OPPMAN, MARK CAPOZZA, WARDEN AT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 25, 2023

Citations

2:20-CV-00663-CRE (W.D. Pa. May. 25, 2023)