From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Norman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 27, 1974
311 N.E.2d 503 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued February 12, 1974

Decided March 27, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN C. MARBACH, J.

Thomas R. Newman and Benjamin H. Siff for appellants.

Henry J. Smith and Gerald Nolan for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The trial court's failure to order the recording of the summations when this was specifically requested by a litigant's attorney was error ( Robinson v. Ferens, 33 A.D.2d 688; cf. Devine v. Keller, 32 A.D.2d 34; see, also, Judiciary Law, § 295). However, it appears that portions of the summation objected to and statements and rulings thereon were recorded. Since the pertinent colloquies during summation were adequately reconstructed for purposes of appellate review, and since there appears to be no material issue which this court is unable to review because of an inadequate record, we hold that the error in this case was harmless.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in memorandum.


Summaries of

Williams v. Norman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 27, 1974
311 N.E.2d 503 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Williams v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WILLIAMS et al., Appellants, v. HELEN T. NORMAN, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 27, 1974

Citations

311 N.E.2d 503 (N.Y. 1974)
311 N.E.2d 503
355 N.Y.S.2d 368

Citing Cases

People v. Harrison

They maintain, however, that defendant was not prejudiced here because the substance of defendant's…