From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Nncc

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2022
3:21-cv-00287-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00287-MMD-CSD

10-19-2022

TERRANCE E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. NNCC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: ECF NO. 69

CRAIG S. DENNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the court is Plaintiff's Reply to Joinder to Answer of Defendant Sergio Rojas (ECF No. 69).

Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules of Practice permit the filing of a reply to an answer. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a).

Therefore, Plaintiff's Reply to Joinder to Answer of Defendant Sergio Rojas (ECF No. 69) is STRICKEN .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Nncc

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2022
3:21-cv-00287-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Nncc

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. NNCC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 19, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00287-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2022)