From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Murray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0069 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0069 MCE JFM (PC)

08-01-2011

LONNIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. M. MURRAY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed June 10, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to pay the appropriate filing fee within twenty-one days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_______________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/014;will0069.fifp


Summaries of

Williams v. Murray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0069 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. M. MURRAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0069 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)