From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2017
NO. CV 16-3126-AB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2017)

Opinion

NO. CV 16-3126-AB (KS)

03-26-2017

ANTHONY TERRELL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), the Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") and related briefing, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). As per 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. // // // // //

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) the Petition is DENIED; (3) Petitioner's Motion to Amend is DENIED; and (4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

DATED: March 26, 2017

/s/_________

ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2017
NO. CV 16-3126-AB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY TERRELL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2017

Citations

NO. CV 16-3126-AB (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2017)