From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Milligans Enters.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Mar 31, 2021
Case No. 20-1357-JWB-GEB (D. Kan. Mar. 31, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 20-1357-JWB-GEB

03-31-2021

DJUAN PRESTION WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MILLIGANS ENTERPRISES INC., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Djuan Preston Williams' Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (ECF No. 3, sealed) and supporting Affidavit of Financial Status (ECF No. 3-1 sealed). For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court has discretion to authorize filing of a civil case "without prepayment of fees or security thereof, by a person who submits an affidavit that . . . the person is unable to pay such fees or give security thereof." "Proceeding in forma pauperis in a civil case 'is a privilege, not a right—fundamental or otherwise.'" To determine whether a party is eligible to file without prepayment of the fee, the Court reviews the party's financial affidavit and compares his or her monthly expenses with the monthly income disclosed therein.

Barnett ex rel. Barnett v. Nw. Sch., No. 00-2499-KHV, 2000 WL 1909625, *1 (D. Kan. Dec. 26, 2000) (citing Cabrera v. Horgas, No. 98-4231, 173 F.3d 863, *1 (10th Cir. April 23, 1999)).

Id. (quoting White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1233 (10th Cir. 1998)).

Alexander v. Wichita Hous. Auth., No. 07-1149-JTM, 2007 WL 2316902, *1 (D. Kan. Aug. 9, 2007) (citing Patillo v. N. Am. Van Lines, Inc., No. 02-2162-JWL, 2000 WL 1162684, *1) (D. Kan. April. 15, 2002) and Webb v. Cessna Aircraft, No. 00-2229-JWL, 2000 WL 1025575, *1 (D. Kan. July 17, 2000)).

Both the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and this Court has a liberal policy toward permitting proceedings in forma pauperis. After careful review of Plaintiff's financial resources (ECF No. 3-1 sealed), and comparison of Plaintiff's listed monthly income and listed monthly expenses, the Court finds he is financially unable to pay the filing fee.

Mitchell v. Deseret Health Care Facility, No. 13-1360-RDR, 2013 WL 5797609, *1 (D. Kan. Sept. 30, 2013) (citing, generally, Yellen v. Cooper, 828 F.2d 1471 (10th Cir. 1987)).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's deadline for service of process is extended up to and including May 31, 2021. Service of process shall be undertaken by the clerk of court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated at Wichita, Kansas this 31st day of March 2021.

s/ Gwynne E. Birzer

GWYNNE E. BIRZER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Milligans Enters.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Mar 31, 2021
Case No. 20-1357-JWB-GEB (D. Kan. Mar. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Milligans Enters.

Case Details

Full title:DJUAN PRESTION WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MILLIGANS ENTERPRISES INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

Case No. 20-1357-JWB-GEB (D. Kan. Mar. 31, 2021)