From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2015
Case No. CV 13-2254-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-2254-DMG (JEM)

08-17-2015

JOEL LEE WILLIAMS, JR., Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: August 17, 2015

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2015
Case No. CV 13-2254-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:JOEL LEE WILLIAMS, JR., Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-2254-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)