Williams v. McKean

Full title: CHADRIQUEZ WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. FCI McKEAN WARDEN, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

1:19-cv-88-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-88-SPB-RAL

08-12-2021

CHADRIQUEZ WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. FCI McKEAN WARDEN, Respondent.

Chadriquez Williams FCI McKean Karen Gal-Or, Esq. (via CM/ECF)

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Chadriquez Williams

FCI McKean

Karen Gal-Or, Esq. (via CM/ECF)

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Chadriquez Williams, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution at McKean, filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus naming the Warden of FCI-McKean as the Respondent. ECF No. 3. Williams is currently serving a term of 438 months' imprisonment for federal drug and firearm-related offenses. In his petition, Williams seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241 on the ground that he was erroneously sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. §4B1.1.

After Williams' petition was lodged on March 28, 2019, the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for a report and recommendation (“R&R”) in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. On July 6, 2021, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued an R&R recommending that the instant petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. ECF No. 12. Judge Lanzillo opined that Williams had neither articulated an appropriate basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 nor demonstrated that relief under § 2255 would be “ineffective or inadequate to test the legality of his detention, ” as set forth in in §2255(e) and discussed in In re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245 (3d Cir. 1997), and Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USP, 868 F.3d 170, 178 (3d Cir. 2017). Id.

Objections to the R&R were due on or before July 23, 2021. To date, no objections have been received.

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

NOW, this 12^th day of August, 2021, IT IS ORDERED that the within petition for a writ of habeas corpus shall be, and hereby is, DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued on July 6, 2021, ECF No. [12], is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court.

As there are no further matters pending before the Court relative to the instant petition, the Clerk is directed to mark this case “CLOSED.”

Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo, Judge