From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Mae

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2022
1:21-CV-0848 AWI HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-CV-0848 AWI HBK

06-07-2022

APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. FANNIE MAE, et. al., Defendants


ORDER VACATING JUNE 13, 2022 HEARING DATE

ORDER REFERRING PENDING MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE HELENA BARCH-KUCHTA

Plaintiff has filed a complaint in which he alleges disability discrimination. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. See Doc. No. 31. In response, Plaintiff filed a motion for accommodation and request for appointment of counsel. See Doc. No. 34. The Court finds that the pending motions should be referred to Magistrate Judge Helena Barch-Kuchta for entry of Findings and Recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 31) and Plaintiff's related motion for accommodation (Doc. No. 34) are referred to Magistrate Judge Helena Barch-Kuchta;

2. The June 13, 2022 hearing before the undersigned is VACATED; and

3. If Magistrate Judge Barch-Kuchta desires a hearing on the pending motions, Magistrate Judge Barch-Kuchta's Chambers will contact the parties and set a hearing date at her convenience.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Mae

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2022
1:21-CV-0848 AWI HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Mae

Case Details

Full title:APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. FANNIE MAE, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

1:21-CV-0848 AWI HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2022)