From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Mae

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
1:21-cv-848-AWI-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-848-AWI-HBK

06-01-2021

APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. FANNIE MAE, BANK OF AMERICA, FHFA, ADRIANA RODRIQUEZ, HUGH FRATER, BRIAN MOYNIHAN, MARK CALABRIA Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE OR SUBMIT AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The matter comes before the court upon sua sponte review of the file. Plaintiff April Premo initiated this action by filing a pro se complaint on May 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff neither accompanied the complaint with the requisite $402.00 filing fee nor an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (See docket).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either submit the attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative, pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action.

2. No requests for extension will be granted without a showing of good cause.

3. Plaintiff is warned that a failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Mae

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
1:21-cv-848-AWI-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Mae

Case Details

Full title:APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. FANNIE MAE, BANK OF AMERICA, FHFA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-848-AWI-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)