Opinion
Civil Action 22-8-SDD-EWD
07-07-2022
ROSEMARY WILLIAMS v. LSU RETIREMENT
RULING
SHELLY D. DICK, JUDGE.
The Court has carefully considered the Complaint, Amended Hardship Complaint, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Erin Wilder-Doomes dated May 24, 2022 to which an Objection was filed and also reviewed.
Rec. Docs. 1 and 10.
Rec. Doc. 12.
Rec. Doc. 14.
The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.
ACCORDINGLY,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Leave to amend is not warranted because Plaintiff Rosemary Williams has had an opportunity to amend her Complaint to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction and has not done so on the facts alleged. Further amendments would be futile.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Rosemary Williams, is DENIED.
Rec. Doc.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on Rosemary Williams via certified mail, return receipt requested at her address listed on PACER.