From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. London

Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit
Oct 19, 1978
364 So. 2d 621 (La. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion


364 So.2d 621 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1978) Tinker WILLIAMS v. Leonard LONDON. No. 12202. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 19, 1978

       Writ Granted Dec. 1, 1978.

       On Supervisory Writs to the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Parish of East Feliciana; William F. Kline, Jr., Judge Presiding.

       LOTTINGER, Judge, dissenting and concurring.

       I dissent from the refusal to grant a rehearing on the merits only.

       However, as to relator's argument that a rehearing should be granted before a five judge panel of this court because of a dissent in the original granting of writs, we are of the opinion that Art. 5, § 8(B), La.Const. (1974) has no application. After a thorough and careful reading of the Constitutional Convention debate on the reargument of a case before a five judge panel, we are convinced that the delegates intended this rule to apply only to the appellate jurisdiction of the courts of appeal, and not to their supervisory jurisdiction as in this case.


Summaries of

Williams v. London

Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit
Oct 19, 1978
364 So. 2d 621 (La. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Williams v. London

Case Details

Full title:Tinker WILLIAMS v. Leonard LONDON.

Court:Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 1978

Citations

364 So. 2d 621 (La. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Bank of New Orleans Trust v. Seavey

In addition, in our view the convention debate on the reargument question reveals the convention was…