From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 21, 2013
Case No. 4:13CV1850 RWS (E.D. Mo. Oct. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 4:13CV1850 RWS

2013-10-21

GWENDOLYN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on my review of the joint proposed scheduling plan. The parties did not comply with my Order Setting Rule 16 conference because they did not provide actual dates as requested. Agreeing to file something "within x number of days" of something else happening, ie., filing an answer, is not an actual deadline. The parties shall file a revised joint proposed scheduling plan that contains actual dates for joinder and amendment, initial disclosures, discovery etc. Agreeing to file something after the Court rules on a partial pending motion to dismiss or a dispositive motion does not constitute compliance with this Order or the Order Setting Rule 16 conference, either, so don't do it.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a revised joint proposed scheduling plan that complies with this Order and the Order Setting Rule 16 conference by noon tomorrow or face sanctions.

____________

RODNEY W. SIPPEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 21, 2013
Case No. 4:13CV1850 RWS (E.D. Mo. Oct. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GWENDOLYN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

Case No. 4:13CV1850 RWS (E.D. Mo. Oct. 21, 2013)