From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 7, 2014
2:13cv1171 (W.D. Pa. May. 7, 2014)

Summary

In Williams, the petitioner's sentence had been modified in 2013 to reflect time credit that the petitioner had received, and he argued that that modification constituted a new judgment between two habeas petitions such that his second-in-time petition was not second or successive.

Summary of this case from United States v. Hough

Opinion

2:13cv1171

05-07-2014

JEFF SCHIRONE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.


Electronic Mail


Judge David Stewart Cercone

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 2rd day of May, 2014, after the Petitioner, Jeff Schirone Williams, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the above-captioned case (ECF No. 3), and after Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 11) and a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until May 1, 2014, to file written objections thereto, and Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20) having been filed on April 30, 2014, and upon independent review of the record, consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, and the Objections thereto, which the Court has fully considered and finds to be unavailing because they are sufficiently undermined by the determinations in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in that Report and Recommendation, Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is to mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order then a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.

__________

David Stewart Cercone

United States District Judge
cc: Honorable Lisa Pupo Lenihan

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Jeff Schirone Williams

GU3700

PO Box A

Bellefonte, PA 16823

(Via First Class Mail)

Rusheen R. Pettit, Esquire

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Williams v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 7, 2014
2:13cv1171 (W.D. Pa. May. 7, 2014)

In Williams, the petitioner's sentence had been modified in 2013 to reflect time credit that the petitioner had received, and he argued that that modification constituted a new judgment between two habeas petitions such that his second-in-time petition was not second or successive.

Summary of this case from United States v. Hough
Case details for

Williams v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:JEFF SCHIRONE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 7, 2014

Citations

2:13cv1171 (W.D. Pa. May. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hough

In opposing Mr. Hough's argument that his 2018 resentencing constitutes a new judgment under Magwood, the…