From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. KMSS Fox 33

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division
Jan 4, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-2328 (W.D. La. Jan. 4, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-2328.

January 4, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Counsel was Plaintiff was directed to file, beginning November 1, 2007, a monthly status report regarding efforts to lift the bankruptcy stay. See Doc. No. 8. Plaintiff's counsel was advised that if no report was filed by January 2, 2008, the case would be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute. See Doc. No. 9. No report was ever filed.

A district court has the inherent authority to dismiss an action, even sua sponte, for failure to prosecute, with or without notice to the parties. See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388-89 (1962); Rogers v. Kroger Co., 669 F.2d 317, 319-20 (5th Cir. 1982). The Court hereby exercises its authority "to manage and administer [its] affairs to ensure the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases" and, on that basis, finds that a dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute is appropriate in this case. Link, 370 U.S. at 630-31, 82 S.Ct. at 1389.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana.


Summaries of

Williams v. KMSS Fox 33

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division
Jan 4, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-2328 (W.D. La. Jan. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. KMSS Fox 33

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS v. KMSS FOX 33

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division

Date published: Jan 4, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-2328 (W.D. La. Jan. 4, 2008)