From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Jordan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 6, 2020
No. 20-6253 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6253

10-06-2020

CHARLES A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LINETTE JORDAN, Defendant - Appellee, and SGT. SCHULTIZ; C/O JORDAN; C/O SPELLER; SGT. RIDDLEY; VICTOR SHULTIS; RICHARD SPELLER, Defendants.

Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03091-BO) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Williams appeals the district court's order granting a default judgment in his favor with respect to one of the named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and awarding Williams $10,000 in compensatory damages but denying his request for punitive damages. We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the hearing on damages as against Defendant Jordan, and we find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. Williams v. Jordan, No. 5:14-ct-03091-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2019). We deny Williams' motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Williams v. Jordan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 6, 2020
No. 20-6253 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LINETTE JORDAN, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 6, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6253 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)

Citing Cases

Hudson v. Sessoms

Hudson's physical injuries are sufficient to sustain a claim for compensatory damages for emotional injuries…

Hudson v. Sessoms

Hudson's physical injuries are sufficient to sustain a claim for compensatory damages for emotional injuries…