From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Jul 1, 2014
573 U.S. 773 (2014)

Opinion

No. 13–9085.

07-01-2014

Tara Sheneva WILLIAMS v. Deborah K. JOHNSON, Acting Warden.

Kurt David Hermansen, San Diego, CA, Steven M. Klepper, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Petitioner Tara Sheneva Williams. Stephanie Brenan, Counsel of Record, California Dept. of Justice, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent Deborah K. Johnson.


Kurt David Hermansen, San Diego, CA, Steven M. Klepper, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Petitioner Tara Sheneva Williams.

Stephanie Brenan, Counsel of Record, California Dept. of Justice, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent Deborah K. Johnson.

Prior report: C.A.9, 720 F.3d 1212.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for consideration of petitioner's Sixth Amendment claim under the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Williams v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Jul 1, 2014
573 U.S. 773 (2014)
Case details for

Williams v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:TARA SHENEVA WILLIAMS v. DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, ACTING WARDEN

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Date published: Jul 1, 2014

Citations

573 U.S. 773 (2014)
134 S. Ct. 2659
189 L. Ed. 2d 737
83 U.S.L.W. 4001

Citing Cases

Visciotti v. Martel

Nevertheless, Visciotti IV entirely precludes any review at this juncture of Visciotti's IAC claims. Williams…

Williams v. Johnson

The Supreme Court vacated our order and instructed us to review the merits of Williams's Sixth Amendment…