From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Sep 25, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

September 25, 1959

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Kings County, SYLVESTER SABBATINO, J.

Zipser Levitt ( Sidney N. Zipser of counsel), for appellant.

W. Frederick Peniston for respondents.


Plaintiffs failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that they have a meritorious cause of action. ( Lunghino v. Marine Trust Co. of Buffalo, 163 Misc. 765; Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.)

The order should be unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to defendant and motion to open plaintiffs' default and to restore case to calendar denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Sep 25, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUEQUEEN WILLIAMS et al., Respondents, v. JARNOT ARDISSON CO., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1959

Citations

19 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
195 N.Y.S.2d 847