From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Huffman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0638 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0638 GEB KJN P

10-13-2011

MARIO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JASON T. HUFFMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's October 3, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
will0638.31b


Summaries of

Williams v. Huffman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0638 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Huffman

Case Details

Full title:MARIO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JASON T. HUFFMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0638 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)