From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Horel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2011
No. C 09-5314 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 09-5314 MMC (PR)

11-28-2011

MICHAEL PAUL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.

The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Horel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2011
No. C 09-5314 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PAUL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

No. C 09-5314 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)