From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2016
Case No. CV 15-03145 JLS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-03145 JLS (RAO)

07-06-2016

STEPHEN LAMONT WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: July 6, 2016

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2016
Case No. CV 15-03145 JLS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Williams v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN LAMONT WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-03145 JLS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2016)