From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Harris

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21 Civ. 7370 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 7370 (AT)

06-22-2022

KIM WILLIAMS & LARRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs, v. EBONY D. HARRIS, ODAI M AL HAJEH, CB LIVERY LEASIN, LLC, VANESSA SOTO, & GLEN CONTRERAS, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. The above-titled action shall be dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Harris

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21 Civ. 7370 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:KIM WILLIAMS & LARRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs, v. EBONY D. HARRIS, ODAI M AL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 7370 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)