From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Han

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 8, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01490-APG-DJA (D. Nev. May. 8, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01490-APG-DJA

05-08-2020

JEREMY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. PATRICIA HAN, et al., Defendants


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case

[ECF No. 6]

On April 17, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Jeremy Williams did not file an amended complaint as ordered. ECF No. 6. Williams did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts' report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) is accepted and plaintiff Jeremy Williams' complaint (ECF No. 5) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 8th day of May, 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Han

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 8, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01490-APG-DJA (D. Nev. May. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Han

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff v. PATRICIA HAN, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 8, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01490-APG-DJA (D. Nev. May. 8, 2020)