Opinion
Civil Action 00-0756-RV-L
March 13, 2001
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This cause is before the Court on defendant's Motion and Memorandum for Entry of Judgment pursuant to Sentence Four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), to enter a judgment with remand of the cause to defendant (Doc. 15). This motion has been referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B), and Local Rule 72.2(c)(3). Upon consideration of all matters presented, it is the recommendation of the undersigned that the cause be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
In this motion, defendant requests that this matter be returned to the Commissioner for the purpose of providing the Administrative Law Judge the opportunity to further consider plaintiffs knee impairment and whether plaintiff meets Listing 12.05, 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P., App. 1.
Defendant states that plaintiffs counsel was contacted and does not object to the motion for remand.
Wherefore, upon consideration of all matters presented, it is the recommendation of the undersigned Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion to remand under sentence four should be granted and this cause remanded to the Commissioner for action consistent with the defendant's motion to remand.
The attached sheet contains important information regarding objections to the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S EXPLANATION OF PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS CONCERNING NEED FOR TRANSCRIPT
1. Objection . Any party who objects to this recommendation or anything in it must, within ten days of the date of service of this document, file specific written objections with the clerk of court. Failure to do so will bar a de novo determination by the district judge of anything in the recommendation and will bar an attack, on appeal, of the factual findings of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C); Lewis v. Smith, 855 F.2d 736, 738 (11th Cir. 1988). The procedure for challenging the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge is set out in more detail in SD ALA LR 72.4 (June 1, 1997), which provides, in part, that:
A party may object to a recommendation entered by a magistrate judge in a dispositive matter, that is, a matter excepted by 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A), by filing a "Statement of Objection to Magistrate Judge's Recommendation" within ten days after being served with a copy of the recommendation, unless a different time is established by order. The statement of objection shall specify those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made and the basis for the objection. The objecting party shall submit to the district judge, at the time of filing the objection, a brief setting forth the party's arguments that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be reviewed de novo and a different disposition made. It is insufficient to submit only a copy of the original brief submitted to the magistrate judge, although a copy of the original brief may be submitted or referred to and incorporated into the brief in support of the objection. Failure to submit a brief in support of the objection may be deemed an abandonment of the objection.
A magistrate judge's recommendation cannot be appealed to a Court of Appeals; only the district judge's order or judgment can be appealed.
2. Opposing party's response to the objection . Any opposing party may submit a brief opposing the objection within ten (10) days of being served with a copy of the statement of objection. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; SD ALA LR 72.4(b).
3. Transcript (applicable where proceedings tape recorded) . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the magistrate judge finds that the tapes and original records in this action are adequate for purposes of review. Any party planning to object to this recommendation, but unable to pay the fee for a transcript, is advised that a judicial determination that transcription is necessary is required before the United States will pay the cost of the transcript.