From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. H. M.R.R. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
151 A. 486 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Submitted May 26, 1928 —

Decided October 15, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 337.

For the respondents, Alexander Simpson.

For the appellants, Collins Corbin.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Williams v. H. M.R.R. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
151 A. 486 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Williams v. H. M.R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET WILLIAMS ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 15, 1928

Citations

151 A. 486 (N.J. 1928)
151 A. 486

Citing Cases

Griffin v. Industrial Acc. Fund

, 169 Wis. 567, 173 N.W. 328; United States Casualty Co. v. Superior Hdw. Co., 175 Wis. 162, 184 N.W. 694;…

Brauch v. Skinner Bros. Mfg. Co.

cord contains sufficient competent evidence to support the award, respondent should be accorded the benefit…