From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Grannis

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 13, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1245 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1245 FCD GGH P.

January 13, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 14, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim Two, alleging violations of plaintiff's First and Eighth Amendment rights, as to defendant Bishop (Doc. 27) is granted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Defendants are directed to file a responsive pleading with regard to the other claims within twenty-eight days.

DATED: January 12, 2011.


Summaries of

Williams v. Grannis

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 13, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1245 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Grannis

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. NOLA GRANNIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1245 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)