From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Nov 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1864 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 1864

11-16-2012

KAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JUAN CARLOS GONZALES, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a pro se complaint. She alleges that the defendants "have attempted to take advantage of and defraud [her] by knowingly misrepresenting the facts" and by failing to make "full disclosure" with respect to a motor vehicle she purchased from them in July 2012. She demands damages of $6000 and clear title to the vehicle.

Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). This complaint sets forth no federal question. Although the parties appear to be citizens of different states, the matter in controversy does not exceed the $75,000 threshold. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

______________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Nov 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1864 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:KAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JUAN CARLOS GONZALES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 1864 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2012)