From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Giroux

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 5, 2022
3:15-CV-1090 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3:15-CV-1090

04-05-2022

JOSEPH WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. NANCY A. GIROUX, et al. Respondents


ORDER

ROBERT D. MARIANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2022, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 56), Petitioner's Objections thereto (Doc. 60), and all other relevant documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's Objections as to habeas grounds 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are OVERRULED for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying memorandum opinion.

2. The reasoning of the R&R (Doc. 56) is ADOPTED only as to habeas grounds 4 and 5.

3. The Court will DENY relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on grounds 1 through 5.

4. The Court will DEFER ruling on habeas ground 6 until the record is more fully developed.

5. Counsel for Petitioner shall be appointed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) by further Order of the Court.


Summaries of

Williams v. Giroux

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 5, 2022
3:15-CV-1090 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Giroux

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. NANCY A. GIROUX, et al. Respondents

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

3:15-CV-1090 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2022)