From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Gentry

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 12, 2018
No. 74797 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 74797

10-12-2018

RICHARD ANTONIO WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. JO GENTRY, WARDEN; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Richard Antonio Williams appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on April 1, 2017. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3).

In his petition, Williams claimed the Nevada Department of Corrections was not applying the statutory credits he earned to his minimum sentences as required by NRS 209.4465(7)(b). The district court determined Williams was not entitled to have good time credits applied to his parole eligibility date because he was serving sentences for category B felonies he committed after 2007.

On appeal, Williams appears to claim the district court erred in its interpretation of NRS 209.4465. We have reviewed the statute and conclude the district court correctly determined Williams was not entitled to have credits applied to his minimum sentence because he committed his crimes after NRS 209.4465 was amended in 2007 and the 2007 amendments specifically exclude category B felons from receiving credit toward their minimum sentence. See 2007 Nev. Stat., ch. 525, § 5, at 3177; NRS 209.4465(8)(d); see generally Robert E. v. Justice Court of Reno Twp., 99 Nev. 443, 445, 664 P.2d 957, 959 (1983) ("When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, the intent of the legislature is the controlling factor and, if the statute under consideration is clear on its face, a court cannot go beyond the statute in determining legislative intent."). Accordingly, we

Williams was convicted of two counts of robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, two counts of burglary while in possession of a deadly weapon, coercion with the use of a deadly weapon, assault with a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit robbery, and burglary for crimes he committed in May 2010. See NRS 193.165(1); NRS 199.480(1); NRS 200.380(2); NRS 200.471(2)(b); NRS 205.060(2), (4); NRS 207.190(2)(a). --------

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge

Richard Antonio Williams

Attorney General/Carson City

Attorney General/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Williams v. Gentry

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 12, 2018
No. 74797 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Williams v. Gentry

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ANTONIO WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. JO GENTRY, WARDEN; AND THE STATE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 12, 2018

Citations

No. 74797 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2018)