From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Geico Government Employees

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District
Nov 18, 2009
604 Pa. 321 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

No. 147 WAL 2009.

November 18, 2009.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 147 WAL 2009.

Prior Report: Pa.Super., 968 A.2d 804.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether, under the MVFRL and our decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property Cas. Ins. Co., 570 Pa. 177, 809 A.2d 204 (2002), the "regular-use" exclusion to underinsured motorist coverage in an automobile insurance policy is valid where the insured is a police officer, who has sustained bodily injury in the course of performing his duties while driving a police vehicle, for which vehicle he could not have obtained underinsured motorist coverage.


Summaries of

Williams v. Geico Government Employees

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District
Nov 18, 2009
604 Pa. 321 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Williams v. Geico Government Employees

Case Details

Full title:Robert C. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. GEICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District

Date published: Nov 18, 2009

Citations

604 Pa. 321 (Pa. 2009)
986 A.2d 45

Citing Cases

Dixon v. Geico

Whether, under the MVFRL and our decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property Cas. Ins.Co., 570 Pa. 177, 809…

Williams v. Geico Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.

We note that in our order granting allowance of appeal, we rephrased the question on appeal and assumed that…