From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Gauna

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 19, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-0005 (S.D. Tex. May. 19, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:22-CV-0005

05-19-2022

JEMADARI CHINUA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOEL GAUNA, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby's Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 18). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge's M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015).

Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 18). Accordingly:

(1) The Court RETAINS the following claims:

a. Plaintiff's First Amendment claims regarding meal service to Muslim inmates observing Ramadan against Former Garza Unit Warden Joel Gauna and Chaplain Hall in their individual capacities for monetary relief;
b. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims regarding meal service to Muslim inmates observing Ramadan against Former Garza Unit Warden Gauna and Food Service Captain Melanie Quiroga in their individual capacities for monetary relief; and
c. Plaintiff s First and Eighth Amendment claims related to the implementation of TDCJ's meal service policy during Ramadan against Executive Director Collier in his official capacity for declaratory and injunctive relief. See (D.E. 1; D.E. 13).

(2) The Court DISMISSES Lori Rincon, Officer Alexander Mendoza, and Jacquelyn Toscano as defendants in this case. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to TERMINATE these defendants from the docket sheet.

(3) The Court further DISMISSES the following claims:

a. Plaintiffs claim for money damages against Executive Director Collier in his official capacity as barred by the Eleventh Amendment;
b. Plaintiffs First and Eighth Amendment claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Former Garza Unit Warden Gauna, Food Service Captain Quiroga, Chaplain Hall, and Assistant Warden Metz; and
c. Plaintiffs remaining claims against Defendants for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). See (D.E. 1; D.E. 13).

(4) The Court DENIES Plaintiffs letter motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction. (D.E. 12).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Gauna

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 19, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-0005 (S.D. Tex. May. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Gauna

Case Details

Full title:JEMADARI CHINUA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOEL GAUNA, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: May 19, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:22-CV-0005 (S.D. Tex. May. 19, 2022)