From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Foulk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
CV 14-2805 DOC (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          Kenneth Williams, Petitioner, Pro se, Susanville, CA.

          For F. Foulk, Warden, Respondent: Toni R Johns Estaville, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          HON. DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Williams v. Foulk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 2, 2015
CV 14-2805 DOC (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

CV 14-2805 DOC (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)