From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2013
102 A.D.3d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-24

In the Matter of Tyrone WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Tyrone Williams, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.



Tyrone Williams, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN, McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

When correction officers approached petitioner's cell to conduct a search, they observed petitioner grab an unknown object and flush it down the toilet. Petitioner was directed to exit his cell, but he refused. Instead, he turned toward the officers with a clenched fist, at which point they used force to avert an assault. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with attempting to assault staff, engaging in violent conduct, refusing a direct order and violating search and frisk procedures. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of all of the charges. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction officers involved in the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Martin v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 774, 774, 949 N.Y.S.2d 798 [2012];Matter of Wright v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 759, 759, 949 N.Y.S.2d 819 [2012] ). To the extent that petitioner and his inmate witnesses gave contrary testimony, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Carrasco v. Fischer, 96 A.D.3d 1315, 1316, 947 N.Y.S.2d 219 [2012];Matter of Cruz v. Fischer, 94 A.D.3d 1296, 1297, 942 N.Y.S.2d 673 [2012] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining claims and find them either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2013
102 A.D.3d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Tyrone WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
102 A.D.3d 1044
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 374

Citing Cases

Watt v. Venettozzi

The penalty was modified upon administrative review, but the determination was otherwise upheld, prompting…

Palermo v. Fischer

The misbehavior report, testimony of the investigating officer and confidential information provide ample…