From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Ferrin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-CV-13298 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-CV-13298

08-03-2011

DEANO D. WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. LEWIS A. "LOU" FERRIN, Defendant.


HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

This matter is presently before the court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the court shall (1) grant the application and therefore allow the complaint to be filed without prepayment of the filing fee, and (2) dismiss the complaint because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the court may permit a person to commence a lawsuit without prepaying the filing fee, provided the person submits an affidavit demonstrating that he "is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." In the present case, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing of indigence. The court shall therefore grant the application and permit the complaint to be filed without requiring plaintiff to prepay the filing fee.

Pro se complaints are held to "less stringent standards" than those drafted by lawyers. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nonetheless, the court is required to dismiss a complaint, whether or not plaintiff is representing himself and whether or not he has been granted in forma pauperis status, "[i]f the court determines at any time that it lacks subject matterjurisdiction . . . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

In the present case, the complaint alleges that defendant sent plaintiff threatening and racially derogatory text messages. As the complaint raises no federal question and both parties are citizens of the State of Michigan, subject matter jurisdiction is lacking. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The complaint is filed and the filing fee need not be prepayed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to Deano Williams
and counsel of record.

Michael Williams

Relief Case Manager

313/234-5172


Summaries of

Williams v. Ferrin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-CV-13298 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Ferrin

Case Details

Full title:DEANO D. WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. LEWIS A. "LOU" FERRIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-CV-13298 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 3, 2011)