From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Ferguson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0888 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0888 EFB P.

February 2, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2011, the court directed plaintiff to submit seven copies of the April 14, 2010, endorsed complaint, as well as, 6 completed USM-285 forms, for the U. S. Marshal to serve defendants Ferguson, Burris, Ballesteros, McCulley, Newton, and Pavilioglo. Plaintiff did not submit any of the copies of the complaint and substituted Fecht and Cowgill in place of Newton and Pavilioglo on the USM-285 forms. He has failed to comply with the order.

It therefore is ORDERED that plaintiff has 20 days from the date of this order either to explain his failure to comply with the January 5, 2011, order, or to submit seven copies of his complaint and the properly completed USM-285 forms to effect service on defendants Newton and Pavilioglo. Failure to comply with this order will result in this action being dismissed.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one copy of the April 14, 2010, pleading and two blank USM-285 forms.

DATED: February 1, 2011.

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed [REDACTED]:

2 7 April 14, 2010

completed forms USM-285 copies of the Complaint Dated: __________________________ Plaintiff


Summaries of

Williams v. Ferguson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0888 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. C. FERGUSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0888 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2011)