From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Exeter Twp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1931 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1931

03-26-2012

NEIL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. EXETER TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)

ORDER

NOW, this 26th day of March, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 3) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
(2) Plaintiff's Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to amend the Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order to cure the deficiencies identified in the accompanying Memorandum. If Plaintiff fails to timely amend his Complaint, Defendants may move the Court to dismiss the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act claim with prejudice.

_______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Exeter Twp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1931 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Exeter Twp.

Case Details

Full title:NEIL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. EXETER TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1931 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2012)