From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Dvi-Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1674 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1674 KJM KJN P.

October 18, 2011


ORDER


On August 16, 2011, this court recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on petitioner's failure to respond to the court's order directing petitioner to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or pay the filing fee, or request the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 8.) On August 25, 2011, petitioner requested that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a); see also Rule 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.

The court also advised petitioner that he must exhaust state court remedies prior to filing a federal petition, and cautioned him that the habeas corpus statute imposes a one-year statute of limitations period. (Dkt. No. 8 at 1, n. 1.)


Summaries of

Williams v. Dvi-Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1674 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Dvi-Warden

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY JAMES WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DVI-WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1674 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)