From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Drown

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 3, 2010
Civ. No. 9:08-CV-880 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 9:08-CV-880 (TJM/RFT).

September 3, 2010


DECISION ORDER


I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order dated July 26, 2010 have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore,

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 24) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 29) is DENIED, and the entire action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and to close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: September 3, 2010


Summaries of

Williams v. Drown

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 3, 2010
Civ. No. 9:08-CV-880 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. Drown

Case Details

Full title:LEROY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. D. DROWN, Civilian Hearing Officer, Clinton…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 3, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 9:08-CV-880 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2010)