From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2968 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2968 JAM CKD P

08-05-2011

KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has moved to substitute A. Hedgpeth, warden of Salinas Valley State Prison, where petitioner is now incarcerated, as respondent. "A petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody of him or her as the respondent to the petition." Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994). The motion is well taken.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for substitution of party (Doc. No. 36) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to substitute A. Hedgpeth as respondent in this action.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

hm

will2968.ord


Summaries of

Williams v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2968 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2968 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)