From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Dial

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2381 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2381 MCE CKD P

09-22-2011

STEVEN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. DIAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On September 9, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for review, construed as a motion for reconsideration, of the magistrate judge's order filed August 22, 2011, denying plaintiff's motion for protective order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed August 22, 2011, is affirmed.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Dial

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2381 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Dial

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. DIAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2381 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)