From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 21, 2009
No. CIV S-02-0864 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-0864 MCE GGH P.

September 21, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 20, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 20, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to Rule 60(b), is denied.


Summaries of

Williams v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 21, 2009
No. CIV S-02-0864 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Williams v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:ABE WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff, v. GRAY DAVIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 21, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-02-0864 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2009)