Opinion
2:22-cv-00700-APG-BNW
08-10-2022
LONNIE WILLIAMS, and individual, Plaintiff, v. DATA MOMMA, LLC, d/b/a PCIHIPAA, a Delaware Corporation; DOES 1-10 and ROE ENTITIES 1-10, inclusive. Defendants.
Jeremy R. Alberts, Esq. Jonathan J. Winn, Esq. WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC Attorneys for Defendant Data Momma, LLC dba PCIHIPAA F. Travis Buchanan (with permission) F. Travis Buchanan, Esq. F. TRAVIS BUCHANAN, ESQ., & ASSOC., PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Lonnie Williams
Jeremy R. Alberts, Esq.
Jonathan J. Winn, Esq.
WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC
Attorneys for Defendant Data Momma, LLC dba PCIHIPAA
F. Travis Buchanan (with permission)
F. Travis Buchanan, Esq.
F. TRAVIS BUCHANAN, ESQ., & ASSOC., PLLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lonnie Williams
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1) (FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR 7-1, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiff Lonnie Williams (“Mr. Williams”) and Defendant Data Momma, LLC d/b/a PCiHiPAA (“Defendant”) hereby STIPULATE to extend the time for Defendant to file its answer in response to Mr. Williams' Complaint (ECF No. 1). if approved, the parties have agreed to an approximate 36-day extension of time for the Defendant to file its answer, which would now be due on September 14, 2022. This is the first stipulation seeking to extend the subject deadline.
Defendant submits good cause exists to approve the requested stipulation as counsel for Defendant was only recently retained and no prejudice will be caused by this extension to Plaintiff. The Defendant further submits the requested extension of time is not interposed for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.