From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Culpepper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00378-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00378-MP-GRJ

03-27-2013

HENRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CULPEPPER, SIMMONS, SINCLAIR, Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 28, 2012. (Doc. 43). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendant Culpepper's and Sinclair's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. All of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Culpepper are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's official capacity claims against Defendant Sinclair are DISMISSED. The only claims remaining in this case are the individual capacity claims against Defendants Simmons and Sinclair. .

____________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Culpepper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00378-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Culpepper

Case Details

Full title:HENRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CULPEPPER, SIMMONS, SINCLAIR, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00378-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2013)