From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Cullom

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Sep 27, 2010
3:10CV00178 DPM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2010)

Opinion

3:10CV00178 DPM/JTR.

September 27, 2010


ORDER


Defendant, Dr. Sumner Cullom, has filed a Motion to Dismiss and a Supporting Brief arguing that this case should be dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See docket entries #8 and #9. The Court concludes that a Response from Plaintiff would be helpful to the resolution of that Motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff shall file, within thirty days of the entry of this Order, a Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (docket entry #8).

2. Plaintiff is hereby advised that his failure to timely comply with this Order could result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

Dated this 27th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Williams v. Cullom

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Sep 27, 2010
3:10CV00178 DPM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. Cullom

Case Details

Full title:KARLIS WILLIAMS ADC #110541 PLAINTIFF v. DR. SUMNER CULLOM DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Sep 27, 2010

Citations

3:10CV00178 DPM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2010)